Russian foreign policy, Geoeconomics & Eurasian integration
About 10 episodes a week.
Recently covered: The Western financialized free-market system, driven by banking oligarchies and geopolitical coercion, is collapsing due to impaired colonial assets and racist strategic miscalculations, while the national system of political economy offers a sustainable path to prosperity and high civilization that must be adopted to avoid dystopian outcomes, Trita Parsi repeatedly asserts that the U.S.-Iran conflict is on an uncontrollable escalatory trajectory due to mutual distrust, the absence of effective diplomacy, and the inability of regional actors to manage the crisis, risking a broader regional or global war, European leaders are trapped in a delusional narrative bubble, genuinely believing in Ukrainian victory and Russian collapse despite contradictory evidence, which drives them toward dangerous escalation and prevents them from admitting failure or pursuing genuine peace.
Part of the daily Geopolitics dossier — read today’s edition.
The Western financialized free-market system, driven by banking oligarchies and geopolitical coercion, is collapsing due to impaired colonial assets and racist strategic miscalculations, while the national system of political economy offers a sustainable path to prosperity and high civilization that must be adopted to avoid dystopian outcomes.
Trita Parsi repeatedly asserts that the U.S.-Iran conflict is on an uncontrollable escalatory trajectory due to mutual distrust, the absence of effective diplomacy, and the inability of regional actors to manage the crisis, risking a broader regional or global war.
European leaders are trapped in a delusional narrative bubble, genuinely believing in Ukrainian victory and Russian collapse despite contradictory evidence, which drives them toward dangerous escalation and prevents them from admitting failure or pursuing genuine peace.
The United States must abandon its maximalist military approach and recognize the limits of its power by cutting pragmatic deals with regional actors like Ansarallah and Iran, rather than pursuing unwinnable conflicts that destabilize the region and accelerate American decline.
Richard Wolff repeatedly asserts that the United States is in a state of imperial decline, characterized by an inability to sustain its global military commitments and a domestic economy undermined by worsening inequality and unsustainable debt. He argues that this decline forces a strategic withdrawal from regions like the Middle East and a reorganization of global alliances as middle countries pivot away from U.S. dependency.
The United States and Europe bear principal responsibility for Ukraine's devastation and potential national suicide because they pursued NATO expansion into Ukraine despite clear warnings that it was an existential threat to Russia, and they repeatedly rejected viable peace deals that would have preserved Ukrainian statehood.
The West, especially the United States, bears principal responsibility for Ukraine's current situation because it pushed for NATO expansion and failed to secure a settlement, leading to a disastrous war that is causing the death of the Ukrainian nation.
Yanis Varoufakis argues that the European Union is a structurally flawed, American-designed cartel that has failed to develop democratic governance, industrial policy, or strategic autonomy, leaving it economically stagnant and technologically colonized. He contends that the EU's inability to reform or invest has rendered it irrelevant, while China's deliberate buildup of alternative financial infrastructure will eventually dismantle U.S. dollar hegemony and expose the EU's dependency.
The United States' belief in permanent unipolar hegemony is a delusional historical anomaly that ignores the natural economic convergence of Asia and the rise of the BRICS, leading to dangerous military conflicts as the U.S. refuses to accept a multipolar world.
The current Western-led global order is collapsing due to economic decline, political dysfunction, and military overreach, leading to a shift toward regional power structures and alternative institutions like BRICS.
The United States is flailing as an empire, lying about its capabilities and failures while enabling regional instability that will ultimately lead to its retreat and the rise of other powers.
Chas Freeman repeatedly argues that the U.S.-led global order is collapsing because the West refuses to adapt to shifting power dynamics and continues to pursue failed, unsustainable policies. He asserts that this refusal to engage in pragmatic diplomacy and accept multipolarity is accelerating Western decline while non-Western powers build alternative, consensus-based systems.
M.K. Bhadrakumar repeatedly asserts that BRICS and India-Russia relations are entering a mature, golden phase characterized by strategic autonomy, economic integration, and a shift away from Western-dominated institutions toward a multipolar world order.
The speaker repeatedly argues that Western narratives and political language delegitimize resistance movements and lead to strategic miscalculations, while the actual legitimacy and popular support of groups like Ansarullah and Iran enable them to withstand pressure and shift the balance of power.
The balance of global power has fundamentally shifted away from the United States and the political West due to Western strategic incompetence, financialization, and the loss of industrial capacity, while Russia and China have consolidated dominance over the Eurasian World Island. Western nations must abandon failed hegemonic projects, withdraw from unwinnable conflicts, and engage pragmatically with the new multipolar reality to secure their economic and national interests.
Parsi repeatedly argues that the prevailing narrative—that time and momentum favor the U.S. in its war with Iran—is mistaken: Iran has retained escalation dominance and control over the war's geography and timing since day one. This claim recurs in his analysis of the Houthi advance on Bab el-Mandeb undercutting the Hormuz narrative, Iran's demonstrated capability to strike U.S. assets and Jordanian bases, and his assessment that Iran, not the U.S., may dictate the timing of any future 'round three' of the conflict.
Scott Ritter repeatedly asserts that the United States and Europe have never wanted genuine peace with Russia, and that only a decisive Russian victory can dismantle the anti-Russian structures and end the conflict. He claims that Western diplomatic initiatives are insincere attempts to manage collapse, and that Russia's military and political strength makes its victory inevitable and necessary for a lasting resolution.
Paul Craig Roberts argues that the United States is in rapid decline and has been defeated in Iran, largely due to being diverted by the Israeli agenda of "Greater Israel." He contends that this diversion has trapped the U.S. in an unwinnable conflict, eroded its economic and diplomatic power, and created a dangerous global instability that requires a swift reset.
Stanislav Krapivnik repeatedly asserts that Russia is decisively winning the war through superior production, logistical strikes, and attrition, while the West and Ukraine are in a state of panic and denial due to catastrophic losses and flawed intelligence.
Jack Matlock repeatedly argues that NATO expansion after the Cold War transformed a defensive alliance into an offensive threat, violating historical security guarantees and directly causing the war in Ukraine. He contends that Western leaders ignored Russian security concerns, abandoned effective diplomacy for ideological confrontation, and pursued policies that are counterproductive and dangerous for European stability.
The U.S. is entering a highly destructive final phase of the war by attempting to strangle Iran's economy, but this strategy will backfire by triggering Iranian retaliation that collapses vulnerable Gulf states and causes a global economic depression, while Iran's military advantage and strategic coordination with Russia ensure it will outlast U.S. escalation.
The United States is entering a new phase of colonialism by retreating into a fortress Western Hemisphere empire to compensate for its declining global dominance, using military threats and economic coercion to subordinate neighboring nations while framing these actions as standing up against historical abuse.
The U.S. foreign policy establishment operates under a delusional belief in permanent unipolar hegemony that collides with multipolar reality, driving reckless conflicts and extractive behavior while ignoring opportunities for cooperation. This grandiosity, rooted in post-Cold War arrogance and broken promises, is unsustainable because the U.S. lacks the economic, demographic, and strategic leverage to impose its will on a world that is actively balancing against it.
The war has entered a new and dangerous phase where Russian restraint is fading, diplomatic windows are closing, and Western escalation risks triggering uncontrolled conflict.
The United States never misses an opportunity to miss an opportunity, repeatedly choosing escalation and failed strategies over diplomacy and cutting losses, whether in Iran or Ukraine.
The United States deliberately violated post-Cold War security assurances to Russia by expanding NATO for corporate and hegemonic interests, a strategy driven by neoconservatives and intelligence agencies that has now failed and is accelerating a global shift toward a multipolar world order.
Pepe Escobar repeatedly argues that the West/NATO-aligned world is largely ignoring, downplaying, or psychologically unable to accept the rapid rise of Eurasian economic and political integration through bodies like the SCO and BRICS. He makes this point when describing the near-total absence of Western media coverage of the summit, the West's blindness to Eurasian connectivity showcased at the Vladivostok forum, and the 'psychological' and 'cultural block' he says prevents Anglo-American strategists from accepting a united Eurasian coalition - concluding in each case that this disengagement is to the West's own detriment.
Kent repeatedly argues that U.S. foreign policy is trapped by imperial hubris and institutional inertia, preventing strategic disengagement from conflicts that no longer serve American interests and escalating the risk of a broader global war.
George Beebe repeatedly claims that Western media narratives and political establishments ignore the reality of Russian advances and Ukraine's deteriorating condition, leading to flawed policies and missed opportunities for diplomatic compromise. He argues this selective blindness prevents the West from recognizing that Ukraine cannot become a viable 'steel porcupine' state and that a negotiated settlement addressing Russian security concerns is the only viable path forward.
The transition from a unipolar to a multipolar world has dismantled the liberal international order, and Western elites' failure to understand realist balance-of-power logic is driving dangerous policies that ignore the security dilemma and the inevitability of great power competition.
Armstrong repeatedly asserts that Western governments and institutions display systemic incompetence by prioritizing short-term political survival over long-term economic and geopolitical planning, leading to inevitable crises that will only be resolved through painful reform. He argues that this incompetence manifests in failed sanctions, unconsolidated European debt, weaponized financial systems, and bureaucratic self-preservation, all of which undermine global stability and necessitate a return to free trade and direct democratic accountability.
Peter Kuznick argues that the world is on an unprecedented path toward nuclear war driven by reckless leadership, the erosion of arms control, and false historical analogies that demonize diplomacy. He contends that only a global grassroots movement, leveraging the moral authority of figures like Pope Leo, can pressure leaders to abandon warfare and embrace peaceful development before it is too late.
The United States is losing its global hegemony because its reliance on coercion, sanctions, and military force to maintain the petrodollar system and regional dominance is driving countries to build alternative security and economic architectures led by China and Russia. This self-defeating strategy is accelerating de-dollarization, pushing Gulf states toward reconciliation with Iran, and creating a new multipolar order outside U.S. control.
Scott Ritter repeatedly asserts that the collapse of arms control and the shift toward viewing nuclear weapons as usable tools has created an unprecedented risk of global nuclear war, driven by U.S. conventional military insufficiency and reckless escalation policies.
Richard Wolff argues that the United States is experiencing an accelerating and irreversible decline of its empire, driven by the unintended consequences of its own economic policies, military overreach, and the global withdrawal from American-led structures. He contends that this decline is manifesting in cascading economic disruptions, political dysfunction, and a shift toward desperate measures like economic nationalism and potential nuclear escalation, while allies and adversaries alike are actively building alternative systems that will ultimately dismantle U.S. hegemony.
Israel's actions and evolution into an expansionist, outlaw state have transformed it from a strategic asset into a strategic liability for the United States, while simultaneously making enemies of formidable regional powers like Turkey and uniting global opposition through its brutal policies and disregard for international law.
Einar Tangen repeatedly argues that the U.S.-led global economic order is structurally unsound, driven by short-term shareholder value extraction, unsustainable debt, and extractive financial practices that are now failing. He contends that Japan's economic stagnation and the U.S. AI bubble are symptoms of this broader systemic decay, while China is strategically building alternative financial and trade infrastructure to prepare for a post-dollar world.
Michael Hudson argues that the fundamental destabilizing force in economies throughout history is debt growing faster than the ability to pay, which inevitably leads to financial oligarchy, societal polarization, and deindustrialization unless a central authority intervenes to cancel debts and direct credit toward productive investment.
Wilkerson repeatedly asserts that the United States is in severe decline, both militarily and geopolitically, and that its leadership is responding with deception and escalation rather than accommodation. He argues across multiple topics that the U.S. is trapped by its own engineered alliances and domestic political constraints, forcing it toward disastrous confrontations while ignoring existential crises like climate change.
The United States is militarily overstretched and financially fragile, causing its allies to lose confidence in American support and prompting adversaries like Russia and Iran to adopt aggressive postures that the West cannot effectively deter.
The Israel lobby's influence has historically allowed it to thwart U.S. foreign policy pivots and subordinate American interests to Israeli goals by exploiting low public salience and leveraging political threats. However, as Israel shifts toward extreme policies and public opposition grows, the lobby is entering a dangerous end-stage where it relies on plutocratic funding and state coercion to suppress criticism, a strategy that is ultimately unsustainable and destined to fail against rising popular sentiment.
Academia and journalism function as instruments of the state, suppressing independent analysis and promoting official narratives to maintain public support for U.S. foreign policy and military interventions, a dynamic that persists across the Cold War, the War on Terror, and the current war in Ukraine.
Ray McGovern argues that Russia's current strategy is defined by extreme caution driven by the unpredictability of U.S. leadership and the deep state's autonomous actions. He posits that while Russia maintains military pressure in Ukraine and signals strength in disputes like the Kuril Islands, it avoids broader escalations that could provoke a nuclear response from an unstable U.S. or Israel.
Mearsheimer argues that the US faces strategic overreach because it refuses to prioritize vital interests over ideological commitments to global hegemony. He contends that the US must abandon the pursuit of liberal hegemony and adopt offshore balancing to prevent the exhaustion of its resources and the deterioration of its global standing.
Crooke argues throughout that Iran and Russia have each concluded, from repeated experience of what they see as Western bad faith (fraudulent deals, deceptive ceasefire talks, market manipulation, and covert attacks on civilians), that diplomacy with Washington and Europe is no longer viable, so both are shifting from negotiation toward hardened, escalatory postures rather than capitulation. He and Diesen contend that Western policymakers and elites systematically misjudge this shift—assuming economic pressure and missile pressure will produce capitulation—while European publics and institutions remain in a 'bunker,' avoiding debate about the risks of an escalation they no longer control.
Across the episode, Larry Johnson and Glenn Diesen argue that the U.S. is running out of viable options against both Iran and Russia because its actual military, industrial, and economic capacity—rare-earth dependency, depleted weapons stocks, damaged refining infrastructure, sailor morale collapse, and a worsening global economy—has fallen far short of the confident rhetoric coming from Trump and his officials. As U.S. leverage erodes, hardline factions in Tehran and Moscow are increasingly driving policy, having concluded that concessions and 'nice guy' restraint only invited further Western escalation, while China and Russia use the moment to deepen Eurasian economic integration and insulate allies like Iran from U.S. financial coercion.
Jiang Xueqin's recurring argument is that Western decline is driven by an insulated, arrogant elite—shaped by the Soviet collapse, the 2003 Iraq War, and recent operations like the Venezuela raid—that pursues wars and confrontations (Iran, Ukraine, Taiwan/Japan) not out of strategic necessity but to sustain an unsustainable imperial debt structure and, in Trump's case, specific loyalties to Israel. He repeatedly frames this as a Rome/Carthage-style overreach that leaves populations in the US, Europe, and the Middle East abandoned and increasingly volatile, pushing toward a 'breaking point' of social unrest and financial collapse that the elite themselves, isolated in their own reality, fail to see coming.
Across the episode, Krapivnik and Diesen argue that Russia's escalating actions—blockading the Black Sea, destroying Ukrainian infrastructure, and threatening expanding buffer zones—represent the abandonment of restraint rather than new aggression, following decades of rejected Russian proposals for a European security architecture from Nicholas II through Stalin, Yeltsin, and Putin. Both speakers contend that Western 'peace' overtures, such as Turkey's ceasefire proposal, surface only when Ukraine and NATO are losing, and that no trustworthy Western partner currently exists to build a lasting settlement, leaving Russia's military escalation to continue—potentially as far as Kharkov, Poland, or beyond—until it meets a force unwilling to fight.
Across the conversation, Kneissl and Diesen argue that Europe is losing power not primarily because of external attack but through self-inflicted choices: abandoning affordable Russian energy, refusing to engage with emerging multipolar institutions like BRICS or the SCO, and imposing regulatory and legal burdens that drive away trading partners and hollow out its own industry and rule of law. The recurring claim is that Europe clings to a unipolar, morally superior self-image—demonizing Russia, ignoring multipolar realities, and even violating its own legal principles (on refugees, citizenship, free passage)—while the real centers of economic dynamism shift east, leaving Europe to decline into what Kneissl repeatedly calls a 'museum.'
Follow Glenn Diesen - Greater Eurasia Podcast and up to nine more shows. One briefing a day, every claim attributed.
Free for 30 days. No card needed. $4.99 a month after.
Automated summaries of what was said on each show — not claims by DailyDossier and not independently verified.