"From disruption to cataclysm"

Election officials are considering every scenario and coordinating with local law enforcement to determine how to push back against federal agents.

States can seek emergency court relief quickly if federal agents seize ballots, but the federal government's actions are inappropriate and unconstitutional.

The administration's goal is to sow distrust so voters choose not to vote, making record turnout the best antidote to voter suppression.

A national emergency proclamation is needed to deploy up-armored ICE at polling booths to intimidate foreigners and illegal immigrants.

It is a violation of federal law for ICE to show up at polling sites, and voters should report violations to election administrators and civil rights groups.

The presence of ICE agents has a chilling effect on voters, even U.S. citizens, and the administration's threats are a flat-out power grab violating the Constitution.

Harp's refusal to complete the clearance process was unprecedented and concerning given her proximity to the president and access to top-secret material.

The White House's defensive response to the story has failed to move past it because the real criticism involves her unvetted access and influence over information reaching the president.

Avoiding in-person town halls is undemocratic and cowardly, and constituents will ultimately hold lawmakers accountable on election day.

Lawmakers are paralyzed by the prospect of facing angry voters, but hiding from them does not help their political prospects in a potential wave year.

Weak job numbers are noisy, and deportations mean the U.S. does not need to produce as many jobs.

The administration's response is callous and tone-deaf, denying the lived economic experience of Americans while offering contradictory messaging about immigration.

The administration cannot get its messaging straight on whether deported immigrants were criminals or hardworking people, and the economic promises have fallen flat.

The U.S. is in a bitter, loveless marriage and may require radical devolution of power to states or regions to avoid real hostilities.

Addressing shared grievances like universal healthcare could mitigate the sense of a rigged system and offer a path to reunification.

It is unreasonable to expect most Americans or politicians to locate Taiwan on a map, downplaying the significance of Graham's debate answer.

Hannity's defense of Graham contradicts his past harsh criticism of AOC for similar foreign policy gaps, exposing a double standard.